Table 1 Results of hypothesis test

구분	Path	st. estimate	S.E.	C.R.	p	△χ2	Result
H1	(1) → (4)	.359	.068	5.306	.000	-	Supported
	(1) → (5)	.429	.071	6.042	.000
H2	(2) → (4)	.226	.077	2.928	.003	2.407	Partially supported
	(2) → (5)	.339	.080	4.229	.000
H3	(3) → (4)	.062	.059	1.052	.293	.016	Not supported
	(3) → (5)	.069	.060	1.152	.249
H4	(4) → (6)	.373	.101	3.706	.000	-	Supported
	(4) → (7)	-.214	.175	-1.222	.222		Not supported
H5	(5) → (6)	.525	.093	5.634	.000	-	Supported
	(5) → (7)	.294	.156	1.890	.059
H6a	(6) → (8)	-.16	.082	-1.946	.052	-	Supported
H6b	(7) → (8)	.314	.079	3.996	.000
H7	(6) → (9)	.618	.067	9.174	.000	28.928	Supported
	(7) → (9)	.102	.055	1.855	.064

One-Tailed test.
Model fit: χ²=892.215, df=536, χ²/df=1.665, RMR=.056, IFI=.943, TLI=.936, CFI=.942, RMSEA=.057.
(1) contractual completeness, (2) safeguarding clauses, (3) extra contractual incentives, (4) trust-credibility, (5) trust-benevolence, (6) affective commitment, (7) calculative commitment, (8) opportunistic behavior, (9) relationship continuity.