Table Results of hypothesis test

Hypothesis Path St. estimate S.E. t-value p-value Result
H1(–) (1) → (6) –.05 .10 –.47 .64 Not supported
H2a(+) (2) → (5) .27 .09 3.17 .00 Supported
H2b(+) (2) → (6) .34 .09 4.01 .00 Supported
H3a(+) (3) → (5) .31 .13 2.32 .02 Supported
H3b(–) (3) → (6) .07 .13 .05 .62 Not supported
H4a(–) (4) → (5) –.12 .12 –1.06 .29 Not supported
H4b(–) (4) → (6) –.24 .12 –2.06 .04 Supported
H5a(+) (6) → (7) .14 .06 2.49 .01 Supported
H5b(+) (6) → (8) –.07 .06 –1.21 .23 Not supported
H6a(+) (5) → (8) .29 .07 4.51 .00 Supported
H6b(+) (5) → (7) .15 .06 2.41 .02 Supported
single-tailed test
Model fit: χ2=736.14, df=412, RMR=.05, RMSEA=.05, GFI=.86, IFI=.939, TLI=.92, CFI=.93.
(1) Contract completeness, (2) Influence activity, (3) R&D capability, (4) Marketing capability, (5) Legal Rebate, (6) Illegal rebate, (7) Dependency on the partner, (8) Partner’s dependency